
This, unlike the crazy insane lunacy of my colleague, is the most legitimate answer to the ultimate “greater than” question. I’m pretty sure Shanghai is on the take from Sony, if not then he’s definitely hitting some of that herb.
Who suggests that Trophies are better than Points? Probably someone who doesn’t have a lot of the latter that is trying to compensate. I can say that because I know what it’s like. I don’t have any trophies and I’m totally compensating for that by writing this.
Points, unlike trophies, aren’t all full of themselves. I mean points are aware that they don’t really exist, they’re kind of postmodern in that way. You get a Trophy in a playstation game? You gain a meaningless item that doesn’t do anything. You get Points in an Xbox game? You get to say “yeah I totally earned a prize for what I just did, but I don’t want anything useful, I’d much prefer a meta-figure by which I can judge my status compared to others, now check out these new converse all stars, I got them to wear at the Grizzly Bear gig on Thursday”.
Trophies are tiered in a way that really puts down the accomplishment, who says that some tasks aren’t worth gold? Some tasks that get you Copper are still important too. The doctors save people, but if hospitals didn’t have people cleaning up everyone would get MRSA and die. Society runs off the backs of the proletariat, and Sony are Ayn Rand, spreading the ideas of a utopia for only the smart and successful. With points everything adds up to reach a much larger goal, every achievement contributes in its own way toward a much larger tally.
Points are also very educational. I’m not very good at maths so if I didn’t get gamerscore I’d probably never see numbers like those on my gamertag. Did you know there’s only 10 numbers you can use? I mean that’s if you count 0, that’s kind of up in the air since it means there aren’t any numbers. It’s symbolic. Anyone pro-trophies is against the school system.
Anyway, Shanghai is a plagiarist, Greg Millar said so.
|
Related posts: |
