Konami: Europe may never visit Fallujah

April 15th, 2009 at 12:01 pm · 6 Comments

fallujaheu

Six Days In Fallujah, Konami’s Gulf shooter, was always going to be a game that courted controversy. From the moment it was announced, everyone from the (wholly invalid) Daily Mail to the (completely valid) Iraq war veterans stepped in to have their say, and rightly so. It’s a game about a sensitive topic, especially since the topic in question is a still-ongoing war.

But is it too sensitive to be released in the West? According to the blogosphere, Konami might be considering avoiding a European release completely. Read about it over the jump.

Six Days In Fallujah, if you’ve forgotten, is the upcoming war shooter set in the titular Iraqi city during a violent deciding conflict of the second Gulf War. It’s all being based on real experiences – drawing from accounts of civilians, former insurgents and members of the US Army – so the accounts will be harrowing and down-to-earth rather than layered over with Hollywood-style glitz and glamour.

Naturally, the game’s being made – as claimed by developer Atomic Games – to tell the story of the various Iraq vets who might otherwise be forgotten. After all, the History Channel and a couple of made-for-TV documentaries will only draw in so large an audience. People are probably more likely to be interested in something if it’s a video game.

Then again, there are plenty of people saying that, understandably, it’s far too soon for a game based on a conflict that’s still ongoing. It might incite more hatred, or give people the wrong sort of message (since it’s a first-person shooter).

Konami appears to be considering the latter, or so Joystiq would have you believe. At a Gamer’s Day last week in Frankfurt, Germany, they revealed that the release of Six Days In Fallujah in European territories would depend on how Atomic Games portrayed the action in the Iraqi city.

Konami themselves have openly admitted that they don’t know how violent the final game is going to be; are enemies simply going to go down with a splash of red or are we going to see shrapnel wounds, serious injuries and obscene amounts of the red stuff? There’s gritty realism and violence, certainly, and there’s simply indulging in too much claret. Guess we’ll have to wait and see.

Before anybody questions why the game might still see the light of day across the Atlantic, keep in mind the very loose usage of the word “Europe” in the games market. In the industry, there seems to be three regions: Japan, the US, and everywhere else. European offices of publishers and games companies seem to cover everywhere else; the UK, actual Europe, Australia and yes, the Middle East.

Naturally, a European withdrawl from sale would include all of the countries mentioned above (probably makes for easier bureaucracy, or something) and so would appear somewhat justified. It would seem a little silly to bring out a game about the Iraq war – which many an Iraqi is against – in territories such as Iraq.

What do you think then? Should Konami avoid a European release altogether or are they being a little too touchy about the region as a whole? Or…should they just can it altogether?

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post



Related Posts:
  • Quickie: Konami Pulls Six Days in Fallujah
  • Six Days in Fallujah gets a title change!
  • Previously on Sarcastic Gamer – April 15, 2009
  • Six Days of Great Consequence.
  • Is it wise to consider spending Six Days In Fallujah?
  • Tags: · · ·
    Categories: Editorial · News · PlayStation 3 · Xbox 360

    6 responses so far ↓

    • CaptainAverage says:

      It all depends – I won’t be too bothered if the game’s Shi’ite! BOOM BOOM!

    • Krelith says:

      My opinion on the matter is that if something is deemed “contraversial” at this point in time, then that controversy should be assumed to last forever. So Konami should either admit that it’s never going to be an accepted idea and scrap it, or go full steam ahead and make the best damn modern war simulator there is.

      I don’t recall CoD4 getting this reception and that was based heavily on the middle east. The only difference here is that Konami are going one step further and using veterans from the war to do their research, rather than general military advisors for hire.

      As for for the timing, I personally see no problem with it. Better to play a game based on present day information than wait several years for it to come out with inaccuracies left, right and center.

      I don’t know… am I really one of the only gamers left out there that play games for the sake of enjoyment? I don’t care about the fact that RE5 involves shooting black people in AFRICA, it was still a great shooter. And I don’t care that this is based in modern Iraq. As long as the gameplay is enjoyable to me, I’m going to support it.

      Actually, most brits in the community (and possibly others from outside the UK), will know of the award winning TV documentary, Ross Kemp in Afghanistan. Kemp spends several weeks with a camera crew following the british soldiers on patrol. We saw EVERYTHING that the war had to offer, and it turned many people away from their screens, but it became an award winning, critically acclaimed piece of media. I see no reason why this couldn’t achieve the same status with accurate research performed.

      That’s my proverbial two cents anyway.

    • lunareclpse says:

      I don’t think it would ever be too Sunni to release this game anywhere.

    • dont forget NZ we fall under Europe too

    • Yamster says:

      I know; I’m hopeless at using “Australasia” in place of Australia like that :D

    • SpAM_CAN says:

      Why Nooooooooooo…

      Jim Sterling was right, the Daily Mail sucks. Bloody tabloids…

    Leave a Reply