Burning Questions from a Gamer

January 21st, 2008 at 5:00 pm · 16 Comments

4whats-1.jpg

Gaming Payola: What’s it going to take?

4whats-prada.jpgOn November 28th, 2007 the internet came to a screeching halt when Gamespot terminated the employment of long-time Editorial Director, Jeff Gerstmann. Writers get hired and fired on a daily basis in this business, but this case was exacerbated by unconfirmed rumors, leaked from within Gamespot’s ranks. Within moments, Kotaku was reporting those rumors, which included accusations that Gamespot’s decision to terminate Gerstmann was influenced by Kane & Lynch:Dean Men developer, Eidos, who pulled their advertising, and hundreds of thousands of future contracts after Gerstmann’s mediocre review of the title.

4whats-scientology.jpgTo make matters worse, Gamespot apparently got advice from the Church of Scientology when it came to their PR plan in this matter. An agonizing week later, Gamespot ran an interview (of itself) where the overall tone was “Nu-Uh! Did not!,” followed by a nauseatingly contrived reader/staff memorial to Gerstmann. By the time Gamespot figured out that the world was falling apart around them, their credibility had moved all of its crap out of that nice 3-story townhouse and was residing in a cardboard box on skid row.

In the months that have followed this controversy, writers and staff at Gamespot have been jumping ship like drunken rats, with each survivor bring with him stories that support the rumors, while also sort-of exonerating Gamespot. The blame, apparently, lay with CNet, Gamespot’s parent company.

Freelance reviewer, Frank Provo, told the truth as he saw it, when he recently got the hell out of Dodge.

4whatscnet.jpg“I believe CNet management let Jeff go for all the wrong reasons. I believe CNet intends to soften the site’s tone and push for higher scores to make advertisers happy.”

Others, including Alex Navaro, seconded the motion while asserting that local Gamespot management had acted solely on the orders issued from CNet-topolis.

4whatsquestion.gifCNet’s position on this has remained firm. In a press release on the matter, they told us all that they had never, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever,ever, never, ever, ever fired an employee due to advertiser pressures, ever, ever, never, ever, ever. Sadly, there’s only so much that they CAN say, since anything more particular to Gerstmann’s case would violate his rights or some hogwash. Who cares about his rights, when the credibility of the sacred Gamespot review score hangs in the balance? What kind of world are we living in?

4whatsegm.gifMore recently, EGM (kissin’ cousin of 1UP.com) editor Dan Hsu published a bombshell that seems to reinforce what many gamers suspected: That game companies can literally buy great reviews if they really want to. EGM, apparently, got blacklisted from pre-release coverage by Midway, Sony Sports, and Ubisoft due to what they felt were “unfairly low review scores.”

Of course they’re unfair…. TO THEM. Like these guys are going to sit up and say, “Hey… ha ha,.. you got us! That game does suck. Good catch.”

4whatsfail.gifIf these companies were looking to defend their brands they can officially add another tally mark to the “miserable failures” column. Hats off to EGM for exposing the seedy underbelly of the Video Game industry, although I’m not past wondering whether there’s more to this that they are NOT telling us…  So… hats… half off.  What happened there was nothing short of attempted payola, something that has been outlawed and litigated HEAVILY in the radio industry where I work.

I have a lot of questions that I’d love to get a straight answer on.

What happens next? How can anyone possibly trust a review score from a corporate-operated gaming site? What kind of fallout will CNet see in this? How much longer are the big game developers going to have Carte Blanche to run around in a cash firetruck, spraying Ben Franklins on every bad review score that affects them? Who in the hell has the power to get to the bottom of this thing and get some (*gasp… dare I say it?) regulation on these fools? What really happened to Jeff Gerstmann? It’s abundantly apparent that his pink slip may turn out to be our ticket to a huge song and dance routine. These mega-publishers continue to sail their yachts further and further into uncharted waters, testing just how far gamers will let them go. 4whatsminnow.jpgI just hope they’ve piled a lot of supplies on their little SS Minnow, because I have a feeling it won’t be long before they find themselves swallowed up by a hate-hurricane. When you piss of a gamer, they don’t just stop buying your games. They also tell a hundred friends, who also tell a hundred friends. Before long, wealthy men in big suits are sitting around a gigantic board room table, trying to figure out how to salvage their image.

So my first “What for which I want an answer” is:

4whatshands.jpg

What is it going to take to get you pissed off enough about the state of gaming journalism and broad-daylight payoffs, to do something about it?

CONTINUE TO PAGE: 1 2 3 4 5




Related posts:

  1. 90. WoW! Smells Like Somethin’s Burning

Tags:
Categories: Featured Content · News

  • commander121

    good points

  • clstirens

    Awesome stuff man.

    Digg’n this up.

  • Dexyn

    My favorite question was “What relations?” Not because it was funny alone, but because it was sadly true.

  • http://www.sarcasticgamer.com Doc

    @ clstirens

    Thanks man. That was almost my first novel. Congrats on finishing it,,, lol

    Doc

  • AtomicFlapjack

    Digged, Man, I love you sarcastic gamer guys. What you said about Sony is very true.
    I would go out and at least rent any game you reccomend, just because I can be assured thet you are giving an honost review. Your pure awesomeness is why you guys are the only gaming blog I read daily. Keep up the excelent work!

  • john

    this is just an xbot having a cry… boohoo

  • http://none Kaz

    um, if bloggers are so important, then how come Sony is, by your own admition, about to woop MS\’s @ss in 2008, even without talking to you tiny nobodys. It seems you actually are not as powerful as you think, Sony can, has, and will do fine without the likes of you insignificant bloggers. You forget that Sony was #1 before your art came into existence, I think they know what they are doing, MS is frankly wasting money focusing on you because they are about to loose even after being nice to you. LOL

  • Jon Malloy

    “They return emails, and make even the smallest blog feel like they matter.”

    So they give you false impressions? Is that it?
    Bloggers, especially YOU, do NOT matter. F’ing get over yourselves!!

    And unless the war is won in America, Sony is the winner in this PS360 race seeing as it consistently rapes 360 worldwide. 250k difference for December USA and Japan in 360′s favour, and adding in Europe makes a nice 350k PS3 victory. That’s at 400 with tough competition and “no games no games no games”

    Yes, you can slip the “unbiased” Sony make comeback 2k8 hehey! comment, but honestly, the console brand that defined today’s gaming deserves much more respect. Sony hate is fervent in these sick blogs, and you deserve to be shunned by them.

  • Jon Malloy

    And PShome?
    That whole rant shows you have NO clue how much better this is than XBL. Not only do the features overlay into in-game XMB, but PSN has always been free, making it immeasurably superior.
    Currently, the only things against it? Yeah:

    Xbot: Bububu all my friends (0) cannot message me in game and no achievements for my e-peen!!!

    You HAVE been misled, people don’t pay for gaming online, chumps do, and MS introduced it.

  • Slashlen

    My answer for #2: You kinda touched on it. When will I have enough vacation time to attempt that much gaming again? December 2009. Dead serious. So yeah, kinda pissed.

    At least I won’t have to worry about Live then. By that time, the PS3 should be soundly kicking the 360′s ass.

  • Dalamornight

    Doc that was a great article and some very good question that would be great if they where ever answered. I always love coming here and seeing what you guys have to say about stuff always very informative and funny most of the time.

  • Nathan Z

    That’s exactly what I wanted. I wanted an email appology from Microsoft regarding the Live outage over the holidays. As it turns out the Microsoft MVPs (Community Leaders, Important “gaming celebs”, ect) gota letter of appology. —–> The average joe subscriber was left off the mailing list.

    It’s a safe bet that all the MVPs KNEW there was a problem already, so it does no harm to apologize to them. The average joe subscribe, however, is a question mark to Microsoft. How many of us KNEW there was an outage? How many of us KNEW the outage was Microsoft’s fault? How many parents blamed themselves on Chirstmas day for not being able to connect to Live? How many of them blamed their ISP? Ect.. I imagine that the last thing Microsoft wanted to do as to alert all those “joe subscribers” of a problem with their service that was Microsoft’s fault.

    When I was working for an old employer of mine I frequently drove a high capacity van with 15 teenagers to various activities up to an hour outside of town. Before they ever let me into one of the vans they informed me, “If you’re ever in an accident NEVER admit fault. We don’t care if you’d just slammed a fifth of vodka and killed everyone in the vehicle but yourself… NEVER admit fault to the other party, to the police, or to any insurance agent you speak with. Let the insurance companies iron it out.”

    So, to solve the problem they offer a mediocre Xbox Live video game (that, to be fair, costs $2.50 more than the $5 monthly subscription charge). Only those people AWARE that the game is available for free between January 23rd and January 28th will download it (aka. Microsoft MVPs and all joe subscribers that knew the outage occured and that it was Microsofts fault….only those “in the know” or those lucky enough to stumble across a free download).

    This gets me back to my original beef with Microsoft. I DO NOT want to be treated like a liability. I want to be treated like a valued, reasonable customer who ONLY requires an email appology to put this issue behind him. I don’t even need a game…. or a free month service. Just some outward acknowledgement by Microsoft that THEY messed up my 12 day long video gaming binge.

  • http://www.sarcasticgamer.com Doc

    @Nathan Z.

    Nice man. That’s an article in and of itself.

  • Iffo

    Well said, Doc! This piece almost sounds like it should be titled “Doc’s Rant (#1 to #4)”

  • http://n4g.com JonMike

    Ok enough is enough. I am tired of all the ps3 fanboys saying psn is better than live because its free. dude i have both. 2 perks about the ps3, blue-ray and built in wi-fi. And thats it. the live dashboard is so inviting, i sometimes find myself on it for hours. As for the ps3 i simply get bored. i could go on for days but to kept it short, ps3 does alot of things like the 360, except the 360 does it better (way better). trust me. ps3 for movies and 360 for games. A TRUE gamer is not a fanboy. So please dont bash one or the other unless you have giving both sides a chance. this post is direct to comments.

  • Pingback: Would you trust a Blogger? - Pewari’s Prattle